Site selection is one of the most challenging problems in clinical trial planning.
Poor site selection may cause significant enrollment delays, waste money on zero enrollers, and compromise trial results. At the same time, site selection should meet many contradictory requirements, such as recruiting targets, budgeting constraints, business rules, and many others.
The site selection process includes two steps.
Questionnaires, analysis of various databases, and subjective assessments are used to get a set of feasible sites. AI is also used to enhance a preliminary set of sites. For example, 200 sites were pre-selected, but only about 50 sites were needed for a clinical trial. How to do it?
Three approaches could be used
ORBee Consulting proposes an optimization model (Site Optimizer) which guarantees optimal site selection. The model selects an optimal set of sites and simultaneously aligns the budget (investigational payments), recruitment target, site capacity, and trial power. The model can be used for strategic (before the trial starts) and operational planning (after the trial – replacement of zero enrollers, recruitment target corrections, etc.)
Which approach generates the best solution?
The optimization algorithm found a better solution than the one based on the ranking. It automatically selects a portfolio of sites aligned with study goals and resources. At the same time, to reach study goals, the ranking algorithm requires ~12% bigger budget and more sites (17 – ranking vs. 16 – optimization).
info@orbeeconsulting.com
Register now to get updates on promotions…
ORBee Consulting offers tools for strategic and operational planning in the biopharmaceutical industry, leveraging operations research techniques for optimization, simulation, statistical analysis, and analytical decision-making.
© Copyright MAVENUP 2024 All Right Reserved.
terms of use | privacy policy